ISO 19139 service metadata record srv:DCPList codelist confusion

It appears that the GeoNetwork WMS harvest selects an incorrect codeListValue for a service metadata record's srv:DCPList (Distributed Computing Platform). Currently, it enters HTTP-GET and HTTP-POST. However, there is a bit of confusion within GeoNetwork and among standards and profiles. Specifically, one could interpret a conflict between DCP in a service's GetCapabilities (OGC) and a service's metadata record (ISO):

  • According to GeoNetwork's WiKi (http://trac.osgeo.org/geonetwork/wiki/ISO19119impl):
    • DCP is set to according the following rules:
      if (name(.)='Get' or name(.)='wfs:Get' or name(.)='wcs:Get' or name(.)='ows:Get') "HTTP-GET"
      else if (name(.)='Post' or name(.)='wfs:Post' or name(.)='wcs:Post' or name(.)='ows:Post') "HTTP-POST" 
  • According to GeoNetwork 2.4.2's metadata editor's default profile:
    • HTTP-GET and HTTP-POST are invalid values. It uses the a similar codelist as the North American Profile.
  • According to ISO 19119:2005(E), Annex D (Mapping to distributed computing platforms), page 54:
    • "The following environments and DCPs are considered as potential targets for platform-specific profiles of platform-neutral specifications:
      SQL-92 and SQL-99; CORBA using ISO IDL; Java 2 Enterprise Edition with EJB (J2EE); COM+; EXPRESS/SDAI; ODMG; C++ and other more traditional commercial OO programming languages; internet/http/Web Services"
  • I could not find any information on DCP in ISO 19115
  • I have yet to read through ISO 19139
  • According to the OGC's service metadata record example in OGC 07-045 (OpenGIS Catalogue Services Specification 2.0.2 - ISO Metadata Application Profile), section D.1.6, page 110:
  • According to the INSPIRE Profile ("INSPIRE Metadata Implementing Rules: Technical Guidelines based on EN ISO 19115 and EN ISO 19119" 2009/02/18):
    • The default value for DCPList is "WebServices"
  • According to North American Profile (NAP):
  • I could not find anything in my ANZLIC Profile documents on DCP.

My bias is towards the North American Profile but I am not even sure what "Distributed Computing Platform" exactly represents and how it can be made useful.

Comments

What is DCP

srichardAzgs's picture

Until some use case(s) for the DCP property can be identified, and a logically coherent codelist that applies to the use cases, it is probably not worth worring about this!